Sunday, December 20, 2009

Avatar – Beyond your imagination

You must be wondering what a movie review has got to do on a finance blog. But when US$ 250 mn goes into the making of the movie, it deserves its mention rightfully here.

Before going for the movie, I had read a few reviews about it wherein the critics had said “there are no words to describe AVATAR”. Now having seen the movie, I find myself in the place of those critics, at a lose of words to describe the most memorable cinematographic experience of our lifetimes.

Avatar has changed the meaning of Pandora for ever, at least for me. It takes your imagination to a completely new level and it wipes out the memories of any science-fiction you have ever seen or imagined. It seems James Cameroon is showing you a world that every child in us would want to be in; a world where there is purity and love for every form of life, where there are glowing grasses and flowers and birds brighter than the colours of rainbow and to beat it all mountains which float in the air!!! The feeling is so beautiful that it makes you cry for the love of it and makes you want to stretch your hand and heart out to touch it, feel it and embrace it! It is a dream that you might have dreamt to be a part of, and induces in you a slight envy for the one who are living it.

Avatar is the first movie wherein humans invade another planet, while since childhood we have been fed on movies of aliens attacking planet earth and to be more precise attacking America. The movie highlights the selfishness which has grown among our race and the extent to which we can go to make money and fame. Moreover the humans are striving to extract a material from Pandora which they themselves call Unobtamium!! Thankfully there are some good people among us who given an opportunity would want to permanently reside in Pandora and give up planet Earth sans the artificial luxuries which they would get on Earth.

I hope no Indian director attempts a remake of Avatar as I do not wish to see a modern day or futuristic Ramayana. Its not that I doubt their movie making capabilities, but am quite convinced about their failure at science fictions. To wrap it up, must say this is one movie which would linger on your minds for a long time and would obviously be your benchmark for any science fiction 3D movie in future. I really hate calling Avatar a science fiction as it seems more real than our real world. What is also interesting is that Cameroon is not looking to make big money from the movie. As he says he would be more than happy even if the movie breaks even as his dream of 15 years has been fulfilled through AVATAR.

Monday, December 14, 2009

Insurance and investment awareness

Insurance has different connotations for different people. For a financial sales person it means insurance premium targets to be met, for a family man, its a sense of security for his family and for some others it might be one of the options of saving on tax without much consideration for the real purpose of insurance as they do not see the need for it.
However it think it is important for everyone to understand that the real purpose of insurance is to provide for uncertainties and unexpected negative outcomes. The risk appetite differs from individual to individual and accordingly financial consultants recommend different classes of assets with different riskiness. Ones investment in insurance should also reflect one's risk appetite. At the forefront i would like to highlight that there should be a clear cut distinction between investment and insurance. ULIP is one product which was the baby of the financial industry and offered the investors a mix of both worlds - investment and insurance. Infact many ad taglines highlighted this issue - "investment bhi, insurance bhi, dono saat saat".
What a layman fails to understand is that he is falling short on both fronts, investment and insurance. The ULIP offers very low insurance coverage and also a significant proportion of the money put in goes as expenses in the first three years of the coverage, thus reducing the investment value as well. Infact the ineffectiveness of ULIPs can be felt in bearish markets when you realise that the insurance coverage on the ULIP is very low and would not be sufficient to meet the needs of your family in your absence and the NAV has also fallen sharply so your portfolio investment value has also eroded. I would say ULIPs are more suited for bullish markets but that too are better investment vehicles rather than insurance.
Always buy one pure term plan for your insurance needs and have investments in mutual funds if you cannot manage your equity portfolio yourself. Infact i would say ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) clearly stand out as a better option to mutual funds also. It has been observed over a large sample size over 15-20 years time period that very few mutual funds could actually outperform the benchmark indices. ETFs provide you returns which are in line with index return and have very low margin of error. There is no entry and exit load and you only pay the brokerage like any other equity transaction, which is minimal. Doing an SIP into ETFs is a wise idea and you do not need fund managers to manage your money.
Now coming back to insurance, realise that have an insurance for every liability and every asset. Insure your assets like home, car, life, etc. Also insure your liabilities like home loans and other loans. But then also avoid over-insurance as then you might just end up paying premiums which could be avoided. Understand your risk taking capacity and your assets and liabilities and act accordingly. If in doubt contact your financial advisors, but don't take any product they push without understanding its implications....

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Is China the next Dubai

To question China's relentless and inevitable rise to the top of the world's economic pyramid today is to invite ridicule. Investors like Jim Rogers have long thought that China is the only worthy investment story on Planet Earth. Anthony Bolton, the United Kingdom's answer to Peter Lynch, recently threw his hat in the ring, emerging from retirement and moving to Hong Kong to start a China fund. Other China bulls have predicted that the Chinese stock market could overtake the United States in terms of market capitalization within three years.

This is heady stuff for a country that didn't even merit its own chapter in the World Bank's "The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy," published only 15 years ago. Back then, it was all about Japan and the Asian Tigers -- Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong, and South Korea. Even today, China is a story of remarkable contrasts. Yes, it boasts currency reserves of $2.3 trillion, making it, by that measure, the richest country in the world. But China also is a country where 200 million people live on less than $5 a day. Understanding that China's rise won't happen without some serious bumps along the road is the key to making -- and keeping -- money from the "China Miracle." Is China the Next Dubai: Lessons from the Tiny Emirate Superficially, Dubai's rapid development from speck of dust in the desert to mirage made real is not that different from China. Cheap financing combined with world-class aspirations fueled Dubai's property boom that included the world's tallest building, the Burj Dubai. Dubai property prices doubled between 2005 and 2008, as commercial and residential real estate in the middle of the endless desert became as expensive as cramped quarters in New York and London. The emirate's rulers even targeted a China-beating annual GDP growth of 11% to 2015. Eighteen months later, the vacancy rate for Dubai office buildings is 40%, even as planned new construction is set to double the city's office space over the next two years. China bulls will dismiss uncomfortable comparisons with Dubai with a knowing chortle. After all, the population of China is a thousand times greater than the tiny emirate's. And Dubai's $50 billion GDP is less than the economic wealth that China has generated in the last three months. Yet, perhaps this is precisely the reason you should pay attention to the rising din of China critics. Even as the media falls all over itself to praise the remarkable efficacy of China's $585 billion stimulus package, "Bond King" Bill Gross of PIMCO made investors squirm when he observed that the all-knowing economic philosopher kings running the Chinese economic show may inflate... gasp!... a bubble of their own.

Is China the Next Dubai: The Sin of Over-investment? Much like little bubble brother Dubai, the problem in China is best summed up in a single word: "over-investment." Even as U.S. and global consumers are closing their wallets , China is building more steel, more factories, and more malls for which there is almost no demand. Much like in Dubai, many Chinese skyscrapers stand empty, even as whole new cities are being built where the vacancy rates are as high as 75%.

One blogger described one of Beijing's leading malls, "The Place," as "stunningly dysfunctional, catastrophic... with fifty percent of the eateries in the basement boarded up. There is simply too much stuff, too many stores and no buyers." Perhaps no project better illustrates China's dilemma than the spectacular, $450 million Bird's Nest Olympic stadium, designed to last for 100 years and withstand a magnitude-8 earthquake. Yet, the stadium now stands empty, with paint peeling ignominiously from its slick girders. "You build it and they will come" is a better Hollywood movie plot, than a sustainable development strategy. Scratch the surface behind China's impressive growth numbers, and they tell an unsettling story. Consider that 19 out of 20 dollars of China's GDP growth this year is from investment in fixed assets -- empty malls, ghost cities, and tens of thousands of bridges that lead to nowhere. China is investing at a pace like no other country in history.

Post-war Germany achieved a peak investment to GDP ratio of 27% in 1964; Japan's peaked at 36% in 1973, and South Korea's at 39% in 1991. The comparable number in China today is 50%-plus. Yet, not only are the Chinese building a lot of stuff they don't need, they also are getting a heck of a lot less bang for their buck. From 2000 to 2008, it required $1.5 in debt to produce $1 of GDP in China. Today, it takes $7 of credit to yield $1 of growth in GDP. No one has done that poorly since, well, the bad old days of the Soviet Union. Is China the Next Dubai: Enron Revisited? The knives are coming out to make money on China's collapse. Jim Chanos, founder of the investment firm Kynikos Associates and iconic short seller, has put the Chinese market in his sights. Chanos made his reputation -- and a good chunk of his fortune -- as one of the first Wall Street analysts to see that Enron's earnings were pure fiction. Chanos believes that much like Enron, inconsistencies in China's statistics -- like the surging numbers for car sales but flat statistics for gasoline consumption -- confirm that the Chinese are simply cooking their books. The Chinese even have a phrase for ripping off foreigners: "Neng pian, jiu pian" -- "If you can trick them, then trick them."

The bad news is that, if Chanos is right, the collapse of the Chinese economy will be 100 times worse for the global economy than the brief hiccup that was Dubai. If China's economy stops running hard, it will have profound effects on its ability to finance the exploding U.S. deficit. In Chanos' view, the slowdown in China may be as big of a watershed event for world markets as the subprime collapse was in the United States. Little wonder that he is betting the farm on shorting China's economy. For students of financial history, the coming collapse of China is as painfully obvious today as it will be to others with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight. That doesn't mean that China won't eventually emerge as a global economic power. After all, the rise of the United States from a tiny country of 2.2 million people in 1800 to the world's leading power a century later was punctuated by at least half a dozen financial manias followed by depressions.

But as the British economist John Maynard Keynes observed, "in the long run, we're all dead." If you have a shorter time horizon, batten down your investment hatches. The investment seas may get rough.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

The Common Elements Of Success of a trader

In Van Tharp’s latest book “Super Trader,” he provides 10 common characteristics frequently found among the best of the best among the hundreds of traders he’s worked with throughout his career. Like me, I think you may find it of interest!
1. They all have a tested, positive expectancy system that’s proved to make money for the market type for which it was designed.
2. They all have systems that fit them and their beliefs. They understand that they make money with their systems because their systems fit them.
3. They totally understand the concepts they are trading and how those concepts generate low-risk ideas.
4. They all understand that when they get into a trade, they must have some idea of when they are wrong and will bail out.
5. They all evaluate the ratio of reward to risk in each trade they take. For mechanical traders, this is part of their system. For discretionary traders, this is part of their evaluation before they take the trade.
6. They all have a business plan to guide their trading. You must treat your trading like any other business.
7. They all use position sizing. They have clear objectives written out, something that most traders/investors do not have. They also understand that position sizing is the key to meeting those objectives and have worked out a position sizing algorithm to meet those objectives.
8. They all understand that performance is a function of personal psychology and spend a lot of time working on themselves. You must become an efficient rather than inefficient decision maker.
9. They take total responsibility for the results they get. They don’t blame someone else or something else. They don’t justify their results. They don’t feel guilty or ashamed about their results. They simply assume that they created them and that they can create better results by eliminating mistakes.
10. They understand that not following their system and business plan rules is a mistake.

Three Stages of a Bear Market Rally


In April it was clear we were in an incredibly strong rally. At the Prosperity Dispatch, we pegged it as a rally you would want to ride all the way to the end. And it would last far longer than most expect.




We also knew it would be a highly emotional ride. After all, when you’re making 20% or more each month, the common mistake is to sell too early. It’s easy to do. The natural desire to sell for a quick profit is a strong one. But history has shown the biggest gains will be made by those that ride out a trend for all it’s worth.

In mid-April we took a historical look at the Three Stages of Bear Market Rallies, how they begin, how they last until the last bear finally gives in, and specific warning signs to look for to know when it’s coming to an end.
Here are three stages of bear market rallies we identified. As you’ll notice, at the end, all signs point to the current rally coming to an end sooner than later.Stage 1: “This will never turn around.”

The first stage of a bear market rally starts when we get the first signs of a turnaround. This happens when everyone thinks it will never turn around. We hit that point in early March. Since then the markets have been so beat up in such a short period of time that any bit of good news can get things rolling higher again.
As the “Obama rally” turned into a sucker’s rally, each passing week brought progressively worsening economic news. There was nothing to look forward to. Expectations were low and headed lower.

We hit this point in March and once the market started moving up on “not as bad as expected” news, it was clear a bear market rally had begun. And since the S&P 500 was down more than 55% from its 2007 highs, the set-up was in place for an extended, sharp, and lucrative rally.Stage 2: It’s a Bear market rally, “The easy money has been made.”

This is the stage where you’ll see most commentators admit we’re in a bear market rally. Many of them freely cite some warning about the coming rally they issued and it was to be expected. Most of them go on to warn this is a bear market rally and advise against buying now. By May 9th, two months into the rally, the S&P was up 36%. That’s a decent return for two years in a good market. In two months, it’s downright fantastic. By this time no one could deny the rally was real. Anyone, however, could quite easily make a case where the rally had gone too far, too fast and it was too late to get in.

This is also the stage where volatility plays a greater role. The markets quit bounding up day after day and there were real corrections (at least 5%) just to keep the herd on the sidelines.Stage 3 – “All clear! Don’t miss this.”This is the final stage. It’s when the bear market has been forgotten by most investors. It’s when the “panic buying” sets in as the big money fears 1) it has missed all the chances to buy low, 2) their performance will suffer, and 3) customers will take their money elsewhere.

To make up for lost time, they buy more aggressively than ever. This is an extremely profitable stage. Yet when the big money runs out of cash to buy shares, watch out, the end of a bear market rally is near. The clearest indicator we’re in the third and final stage is the stagnating upward momentum. The S&P 500 rose 36% in the first two months of the rally. It rose a respectable 13% in the next three months. It rose 6% in the last three months. The rally appears to be running out of steam. At this time, however, most investors feel more comfortable buying stocks than they have since the rally began. GDP is up, earnings are up, and corporate executives are issuing positive guidance about their near-term growth prospects (most refused to even venture a guess last year).

The “all clear” has been sounded by executives, analysts, and many others. And investors continue to put more money to work (or, from our philosophy, at risk). Last week was the 34th week in a row in which investors put more money into mutual funds than they took out. As for the aggressive, panic-style buying we expected, it has been largely masked by the rebound in share prices. For instance, a mutual fund manager who wants to buy 10 million shares of Bank of America only had to put up $40 million in March. A few weeks ago, the same stake would cost $180 million. As a result, a lot more money may be going in, but it’s having a significantly less noticeable impact.
———————————————————–It’s Never Different This Time
As this rally shows greater and greater weakness, the risk and reward situation continues to turn against going “all in” now. Also, since most of them have the wind at their backs and a renewed confidence, they’re sure they will be able to achieve the nearly impossible and get out at the top. Since it’s never different this time, we know those facts are not going to stop investors from trying either one of them. That’s why right now, the best advice we can follow is what we’ve stuck to since the beginning. Look for sectors with exceptional fundamentals, identify the best risk/reward opportunities in those sectors, develop a plan, and stick to it. Although day-to-day it never feels quite the same and emotions, left unchecked, will quickly cloud out reality, we know it’s never different this time. And there’s no reason to expect this rally to play out any different than every one that has come before it and every one that will come again.

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Emergence of India as a Financial Super-power



The BRIC report spoke of the emergence of Brazil, Russia, India and China as the markets to watch out for over the next 50 years. But little did the writers of the report know that BRIC countries could also emerge as the next financial super houses of the world. I guess that was understood that with economic strength, financial strength would also follow, but little did we know that it would be the financial strength that would lead to becoming an economic super-power.

The sequel of events that have unraveled in 2008 in the US and European financial sector has much larger global impact than what meets the eye. The implications and the fall out from these would have far deeper effects that would shape the contours of international finance markets in the years ahead. What were once the behemoths and the invincibles of the Wallstreet have all fallen like dominos. It seems like all were a band of brothers, rising and falling together till the end. Anyway I would not delve into the reasons that led to the collapse of all the Wallstreet “invincibles”. Its out there in the open for everyone to see, that the i-bankers were really gambling with everyone’s money. On hindsight it seems they have been rightly called i-bankers. The “i” has been aptly popularized by Apple representing the generation which is more self centric and puts the self before the rest. These bankers too it seems were more concerned about the bonuses flowing into their kitty and gave a little, if any, regard to the company’s very existence.

Moving back to original discussion, I feel the current financial crisis before us would realign the global financial markets and US could lose its dominance in this arena. This saga of American brand erosion had started long time back when the first outsourcing of manufacturing and services took place from America to China and India in order to capitalize on the economic savings these destinations offered. Slowly and gradually over the years, the proportion of manufacturing activities that got outsourced to China and BPOs & KPOs that emerged in India, was a clear tell all sign of the changing dimensions of global economic balance. America continued to focus more on the front end in all its business spheres. Americas banking industry and Wallstreet was also not spared and most of the processes involved in these sectors were outsourced. Having worked on these high end wallstreet deals, the Indian KPO have developed a skill set that is now incomparable to any in the world. Now with the high street i-banks having disappeared, the knowledge base in India is all set to support and develop the domestic i-banks in a big way.
But a financial super-power doesn’t only mean having investment banks up and running. The biggest push for financial independence of the country would emerge from the domestic consumption of its over a billion citizens. …..More to follow in this series…. Keep watching the space….